Sugar Creek Packing Co.: Installing Reverse Osmosis Technology to Achieve Energy, Water, and Chemical Cost Savings for Steam Systems

BACKGROUND

Sugar Creek Packing Co. (Sugar Creek) is a diversified and flexible food manufacturer helping some of the largest companies develop food solutions. The company operates seven manufacturing plants across the United States. The facility in Cambridge City, Indiana (CCI) is approximately 418,000 square feet and produces 80 million pounds of product per year. A Reverse Osmosis (RO) membrane system was installed at Sugar Creek’s CCI facility to improve energy and water efficiency and reduce chemical treatment costs associated with operating the facility’s steam system.

More

The RO system removes mineral content before the make-up water goes into the feedwater tank, helping to keep the boiler running smoothly because of lower alkalinity. Comparing operational data from January 2021 and 2022 after the RO system was installed, the annual natural gas savings are estimated at 3.7% or 6,066 MMBtu and $18,000; and the annual chemical cost savings are estimated at 43% or $25,000.

Less

SOLUTIONS

In addition to energy and cost savings, this project was driven by the need for increased steam generation at the CCI plant. The cost of the reverse osmosis (RO) system was $233,000, and project implementation took 8 months to complete. Energy savings from the RO system were achieved primarily through the reduction of boiler blowdowns from the use of higher-quality make-up water, which requires fewer chemicals to treat and prevents consumption of natural gas that would otherwise be used to heat new makeup water after boiler blowdowns. Before the RO system was installed, make-up water for the boiler system had a Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentration of 700 ppm, and the blowdown cycle of concentration (COC) was around 4. The installation of the RO system reduced the concentration of TDS in the make-up water to 35 ppm. This theoretically increased the maximum COCs to 77, but for safety reasons, the COC is set at 55. Operation at higher COCs reduces blowdown, leading to less chemical loss and the amount of chemical required to prevent condensate corrosion was reduced due to the lower alkalinity of the water. 

Cost Savings Energy Water Chemical
Janaury 2021 $41,318 $7,522 $4,737
January 2022 $39,801 $6,687 $2,683
2021 Annual Total $495,811 $90,268 $56,844
2022 Annual Total (Estimated) $477,613 $80,249 $32,191
2022 to 2021 Annual Savings (Estimated) $18,198 $10,019 $24,653
2022 to 2021 Annual Savings (%) 4% 11% 43%

 

More

The project scope included both a steam system upgrade and an expansion of the building. Sugarcreek’s operations at CCI currently require 58,000 pounds per hour of steam to operate, but before this project, the system could generate only 38,000 pounds per hour. With the support of vendors and the SugarCreek onsite operation team, time was saved on testing and commissioning, and the system began normal operation in December 2021. 

A picture containing text, building, warehouse</p>
<p>Description automatically generated

Less

OTHER BENEFITS

The annual water savings from the CCI project is estimated at 11.1% or 3,340 kGal and $10,000. These savings are based on measurements taken during the month of January, so additional water savings will be realized during the summer months with RO water being used for cooling processes. SugarCreek is also planning projects that will offset water use with the concentrated water from the RO system for processes that are not sensitive to water hardness such as washing and rinsing.

More

Due to the success of the RO system at CCI, the Sugar Creek engineering team is evaluating this technology for implementation at other locations. The plant located in Frontenac, Kansas, is another candidate for an RO system installation to improve overall boiler operation and steam production. 

Less

Annual Energy Use

Baseline (2021)
165,270 MMBtu of Natural Gas
Estimated (2022)
159,204 MMBtu of Natural Gas

Energy Savings:

4%

Annual Energy Cost

Baseline (2021)
$495,811
Estimated (2022)
$477,613

Cost Savings:

4%

Annual Water Use

Baseline (2021)
30,089 kGal
Estimated (2022)
26,750 kGal

Water Savings:

11%

Annual Water Cost

Baseline (2021)
$90,268
Estimated (2022)
$80,249

Cost Savings:

11%

Sector Type

Industrial

Location

Cincinnati, Ohio

Project Size

418,000 Square Feet

Financial Overview

$233,000